Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


BUSTILLOS v. MURPHY, D037559

Where a member of the public has used property over the years for recreational purposes, he is not entitled, as a matter of law pursuant to Civil Code section 1009, to a prescriptive easement across such property for recreational purposes.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/20/2002
  • Published 03/20/2002

Judges

  •  KREMER, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Luis Michael Bustillos, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Winet, Patrick & Weaver, Los Angeles, Randall L. Winet, San Diego, and Daniel M. Gilleon, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard