FRAZEE v. SEELY, G025981
In a suit for professional malpractice against attorneys, a court-s refusal to grant plaintiff a continuance to oppose a motion for summary judgment was improper where plaintiff-s counsel had not yet received defendant-s deposition transcript from the court reporter.
- Decided 01/25/2002
- Published 01/25/2002
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Thomas P. Dovidio and Thomas P. Dovidio, Whittier, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Gregory H. Halliday and Ralph A. Guirgis, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents Hall Seely, Katia Diehl and Seely & Russell., Callahan, McCune & Willis and Neal C. Swensen, Tustin, for Defendants and Respondents Michelle Elizabeth Hales, Robert P. Etienne and Hales, Hales & Etienne.