California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

FRAZEE v. SEELY, G025981

In a suit for professional malpractice against attorneys, a court-s refusal to grant plaintiff a continuance to oppose a motion for summary judgment was improper where plaintiff-s counsel had not yet received defendant-s deposition transcript from the court reporter.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/25/2002
  • Published 01/25/2002

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Law Offices of Thomas P. Dovidio and Thomas P. Dovidio, Whittier, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Gregory H. Halliday and Ralph A. Guirgis, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents Hall Seely, Katia Diehl and Seely & Russell., Callahan, McCune & Willis and Neal C. Swensen, Tustin, for Defendants and Respondents Michelle Elizabeth Hales, Robert P. Etienne and Hales, Hales & Etienne.
Copied to clipboard