California Court of Appeal
SONGSTAD v. SUPERIOR COURT (NESTANDE), D038503
Under Elections Code 9105, only a proponent of a initiative has standing during the prequalification phase to seek an order requiring the county counsel to amend that title and summary.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/21/2001
- Published 11/21/2001
Judges
- McDONALD, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, Robert D. Thornton, John J. Flynn III, Adam H. Relin, Irvine, Celena H. Chen; Songstad, Randall & Ulich and William D. Coffee, Irvine, for Petitioners Allan Songstad, Bill Campbell, Debbie Cook and Pat Bates., Songstad, Randall & Ulich and William D. Coffee, Irvine, for Petitioner Mike Alvarez., Strumwasser & Woocher, Fredric D. Woocher and Michael J. Strumwasser, Santa Monica, for Real Parties in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- Laurence M. Watson, County Counsel, Edward N. Duran, Steven C. Miller and Nicole A. Sims, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents Laurence M. Watson, County Counsel for the County of Orange and Rosalyn Lever, Registrar of Voters of the County of Orange., No appearance for Respondent Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange.