California Court of Appeal

In eminent domain case, government's failure to value the use as a nonconforming use that was specifically required by ordinance to be terminated, along with a jury verdict over $400,000 more than the government offer, made government offer unreasonable under Code of Civil Procedure 1250.410.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/14/2001
• Published 11/14/2001

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, K. Erik Friess and Michael W. Shonafelt, Irvine, for Defendants and Appellants.,  William M. McMillan, David R. Simmes, Alexander D. DeVorkin, Los Angeles, and Amanda Edmunds DeJesus for Plaintiff and Respondent.