California Court of Appeal

Expert testimony that defendant's alleged conduct was consistent with a certain "type" of rapist constituted improper profiling evidence even if it was used to defeat stereotypes of rapists.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/12/2001
• Published 10/12/2001

Judges

• CORRIGAN, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
•  Office of the Attorney General, David H. Rose, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Respondent., Stephen Chapman Matchett, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant.