VINER v. SWEET, B138149
Plaintiffs alleging transactional legal malpractice are not required to prove the opposing side in the contract negotiations would have given them a better deal than the contract terms affected by their attorney's negligence had the negligence not occurred.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/28/2001
- Published 09/28/2001
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Munger, Tolles & Olson, Dennis C. Brown, Mark B. Helm, Allison B. Stein, Los Angeles, Steven W. Hawkins; Paul J. Watford, Los Angeles; Kester & Isenberg and Charles F. Kester, Woodland Hills, for Defendants and Appellants., Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Peter C. Sheridan, Los Angeles, and Mila Livitz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.