Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


VINER v. SWEET, B138149

Plaintiffs alleging transactional legal malpractice are not required to prove the opposing side in the contract negotiations would have given them a better deal than the contract terms affected by their attorney's negligence had the negligence not occurred.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/28/2001
  • Published 09/28/2001

Judges

  •  PERLUSS, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Munger, Tolles & Olson, Dennis C. Brown, Mark B. Helm, Allison B. Stein, Los Angeles, Steven W. Hawkins;  Paul J. Watford, Los Angeles;  Kester & Isenberg and Charles F. Kester, Woodland Hills, for Defendants and Appellants., Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Peter C. Sheridan, Los Angeles, and Mila Livitz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard