Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


IN RE: MARRIAGE OF DUFFY, B136160

Under Family Code section 721, evidence of husband's historical pattern of giving wife curt and dismissive answers when she sought financial information is not sufficient to support a breach of fiduciary duty where husband provided information when pressed and wife did not seek information on occasion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/22/2001
  • Published 08/22/2001

Judges

  •  SPENCER, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Honey Kessler Amado, Beverly Hills, and Diane E. Berley, Woodland Hills, for Appellant Patricia A. Duffy., Bruce Adelstein, Los Angeles, for Appellant Vincent J. Duffy.

Copied to clipboard