Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


NAPA CITIZENS FOR HONEST GOV'T v. NAPA COUNTY BD. OF SUPERVISORS, A089095

Under Planning and Zoning laws, Government Code section 65000 et seq., and CEQA, a mitigation measure once adopted can be deleted but a governing body must state a legitimate reason for deleting it, and must support that statement of reason with substantial evidence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/03/2001
  • Published 08/03/2001

Judges

  • STEIN, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Law Office of J. William Yeates, J. William Yeates, Sacramento, Mary U. Akens; Law Offices of William D. Ross, William D. Ross, Los Angeles, and Barbara J. Higgins, for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Chatten-Brown and Associates, Jan Chatten-Brown, Los Angeles, and Douglas P. Carstens, for Mountain Lion Foundation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Planning and Conservation League and Sierra Club as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Miller, Starr & Regalia, Arthur F. Coon and Christian M. Carrigan, Walnut Creek, for Defendant and Appellant., McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, Stephen L. Kostka and Laura A. Colthurst, Walnut Creek, for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.
Copied to clipboard