Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CORP. v. HOME INS. CO., B134257, B135081, B138225, B138843

In an insurance action with a continuous "trigger" over several years that resulted from one "occurrence", the anti-stacking rule will not limit the insured's recovery to a single year's policy limit.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/25/2001
  • Published 07/25/2001

Judges

  • TODD, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Troop Steuber Pasich Reddick & Tobey, Kirk A. Pasich, Catherine L. Rivard, Cassandra C. Shivers, Los Angeles;  Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, Nancy Sher Cohen, Reynold L. Siemens and Carlyle W. Hall III, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant Alpha Therapeutic Corporation.

  • For Appellees:
  • Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow & Canter, Mark W. Flory, Nancy J. Mindel and Angela Lui Walsh, Los Angeles, for Defendant, Respondent and Appellant Associated International Insurance Company., Kroll, Rubin & Fiorella, James D. Otto and Christine A. Roney, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent The Home Insurance Company., Ross, Dixon & Bell, Alec M. Barinholtz, Irvine, Rebecca L. Ross, Chicago, IL, Charles I. Hadden, Richard J. Pratt and Jodi L. Cleesattle, Washington, for Defendants and Respondents Transcontinental Insurance Company, London Guarantee and Accident Company of New York and Harbor Insurance Company., Lord, Bissell & Brook and Jeri Rouse Looney, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Transport Indemnity Corporation., No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Topa Insurance Company.
Copied to clipboard