Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


DEAUVILLE REST., INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (TAYLOR), B148105

Under Code of Civil Procedure 1008, a motion that is based on new evidence and does not challenge validity of a prior motion is a "renewed" motion and not a motion to reconsider so that moving party can file a preemptory challenge against judge who heard first motion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/16/2001
  • Published 07/16/2001

Judges

  • WOODS, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  •  Troy & Gould and Jeffery W. Kramer, for Petitioner., Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, Jeffrey S. Wruble, Geoffrey F. Bogeaus and Ruth L. Seroussi, Los Angeles, for Real Parties in Interest.

  • For Appellees:
  • Morrison & Foerster, Raymond L. Wheeler, William B. Grenner and Beatriz M.G. Gordon, Irvine, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard