California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA NAT'L GUARD, A083451; A085180

Federal law preempts the equal protection and free speech guarantees of the California Constitution with respect to individuals serving in active duty positions in the National Guard for which federal recognition is required.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/29/2001
  • Published 06/29/2001

Judges

  • McGUINESS, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  •  Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Todd E. Thompson, San Francisco, Anne-Marie Eileraas, Elizabeth W. Scott, Sherri A. Sokeland and Kimberly A. Bliss, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Respondents in Case No. A083451 and for Plaintiff and Appellant in Case No. A085180., Munger, Tolles & Olson, Jerome C. Roth, San Francisco, Hoojoon Hwang and John L. Flynn, Santa Ana, for Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents in Case No. A083451., Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, Martin H. Milas and David S. Chaney, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Damon M. Connolly and Miguel A. Neri, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, Kim M. Settles and Denis S. Kenny, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants in Case No. A083451 and for Defendants and Respondents in Case No. A085180.
Copied to clipboard