Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


VALDEZ v. CLAYTON INDUS., B139582

Under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, evidence that a supervisor told employee of same gender that he needed oral sex or that employee was a whore is sufficient to support a claim of sexual harassment despite evidence that use of profanity was common and that employee and his coworkers often told jokes with sexual content.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/08/2001
  • Published 05/08/2001

Judges

  • CURRY, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Benedon & Serlin, Douglas G. Benedon, Woodland Hills, and Gerald M. Serlin;  Mancini & Gallagher, Marcus A. Mancini, Valencia, Mary Ann Gallagher, and David A. Cohn, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Troop Steuber Pasich Reddick & Tobey, Jon D. Meer, and Christopher J. Manfredi, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard