AM. CEMWOOD CORP. v. AM. HOME ASSURANCE CO., A089185
A defendant seeking to stay or dismiss an action on the basis of forum non conveniens must show that all defendants are subject to jurisdiction in the proposed alternate forum.
- Decided 02/28/2001
- Published 02/28/2001
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, Paul W. Sugarman, David B. Goodwin, Monika P. Lee, San Francisco and Benjamine D. Brown, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Coddington, Hicks & Danforth, Randolph Steven Hicks, Redwood City; Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, Barry R. Ostrager and Mary Kay Vyskocil, for Defendants and Respondents.