SPIELHOTZ v. SUPERIOR COURT (LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TEL. CO.), B131655
47 USC section 332(c)(3)(A), which prohibits states from regulating fees charged by cell phone companies, does not exempt cell phone providers from suits alleging false advertising of coverage areas.
- Decided 02/08/2001
- Published 02/08/2001
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Jacqueline E. Mottek, Michael W. Sobol, Stephen H. Cassidy and Fabrice N. Vincent, San Francisco; Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, Los Angeles, William S. Lerach, Leonard B. Simon, William Dato, Alan M. Mansfield, San Diego, Reed R. Kathrein, San Francisco, and Patrick W. Daniels; Ronald F. Hoffman, for Petitioners., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Palo Alto, Mark A. Perry, Steven E. Sletten and Christine Naylor, Cerritos, for Real Parties in Interest.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent.