United States Eighth Circuit - October 2001 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 7
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 61
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
ALL DENOMINATIONAL NEW CHURCH v. PELOFSKYUnited States Eighth Circuit
Bankruptcy LawUnder 11 USC 1112(b)(2), a debtor's failure to provide monthly operating reports justifies dismissal of the Chapter 11 petition. |
10/31/2001 | 01-6053 |
US v. PEREZUnited States Eighth Circuit
Criminal Law & ProcedureA plea to the charge of drug trafficking may be knowing and intelligent, even if the judge did not mention drug quantity as an element of the offense,... |
10/31/2001 | 00-1875 |
US v. CARTERUnited States Eighth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure21 USC 851(e), which limits the ability of a defendant to challenge a prior conviction used in a sentence enhancement, is not unconstitutional. |
10/31/2001 | 01-1556 |
US v. WOODSUnited States Eighth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing21 USC 841(b)(1)(A) does not violate Apprendi even if it does not require drug quantities as an element of the offense where sentencing under the... |
10/30/2001 | 01-1822 |
SIMMONS FOOD, INC. v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
ContractsWhere a putative contract set forth specific quantities for some years but not others, it does not qualify as an output or requirements contract. |
10/30/2001 | 01-1375 |
DULLEA LAND CO. v. IDEAL AG CORP.United States Eighth Circuit
Bankruptcy LawIn determining whether a preferential transfer took place, a bankruptcy court may disregard the valuation of the debtor if it is contradicted by... |
10/29/2001 | 01-6037 |
US v. CAMPBELLUnited States Eighth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingApprendi does not apply to 18 USC 924 sentence enhancements for prior convictions. |
10/29/2001 | 01-1485 |
HOLMSTROM v. MASSANARIUnited States Eighth Circuit
Government BenefitsIn determining whether applicant had residual function capacity, evidence that applicant needed to lie down several times a day is sufficient to... |
10/29/2001 | 01-1432 |
US v. RAYLUnited States Eighth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Cyberspace Law, EvidenceWitness testimony and physical evidence corroborating it are sufficient to support a conviction of enticing a minor to produce sexually explicit... |
10/29/2001 | 01-1338 |
FOGELBACH v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.United States Eighth Circuit
Injury & Tort LawUnder Missouri law, the constructive notice standard for slip and fall cases inside self-service stores also applies to injuries outside of the... |
10/29/2001 | 01-1199 |
Results 1 to 10 of 61