| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
MARTIN K. EBY CONSTR. CO. INC. v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSITUnited States Fifth Circuit
Construction, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Government Contracts, Transportation
Plaintiff, awarded a contract to build a section of defendant's light-rail transit line, must exhaust its administrative remedies before seeking...
|
04/29/2004 | 03-10728 |
| 04/29/2004 | 03-30478 | |
UNION PLANTERS BANK NAT'L ASS'N v. GAVELUnited States Fifth Circuit
Civil Procedure
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibits subject matter jurisdiction in this case, which seeks inferior federal court review of a final, appealable state...
|
04/29/2004 | 03-30409 |
US v. EVERISTUnited States Fifth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Trial court did not plainly err, either by failing to consider appropriate factors for the imposition of a partially concurrent sentence under 18...
|
04/27/2004 | 03-20059 |
| 04/27/2004 | 03-40353 | |
NGUYEN v. ASHCROFTUnited States Fifth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Immigration Law
A conviction under a statute criminalizing the facilitation by one person of the intentional use of force by another person constitutes a crime of...
|
04/26/2004 | 02-60707 |
US v. PHIPPSUnited States Fifth Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Upward departure through consecutive sentencing, imposed on remand, was both warranted by the existence of aggravating factors and reasonable in...
|
04/26/2004 | 03-10427 |
BLAZ v. BELFERUnited States Fifth Circuit
Class Actions, Securities Law
Application of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act to pre-enactment conduct presents no retroactivity concern because the Act regulates...
|
04/22/2004 | 03-20575 |
IN THE MATTER OF BILOXI CASINO BELLE INC.United States Fifth Circuit
Insurance Law
Title insurance policy did not insure the security interest in a casino boat being constructed at a location remote from the insured land where the...
|
04/21/2004 | 03-60348 |
TMI INC. v. MAXWELLUnited States Fifth Circuit
Antitrust & Trade Regulation, Consumer Protection Law, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property, Trademark
Defendant's website, complaining about plaintiff company, was a non-commercial gripe site, did not violate the anti-dilution or the...
|
04/21/2004 | 03-20243, 03-20291 |