Description | Date | Docket # |
---|---|---|
GARVIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIAUnited States Third Circuit
Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Injury & Tort Law
District court properly denied plaintiff's motions to amend her 42 U.S.C. section 1983 complaint arising from alleged acts of excessive police force.
|
12/31/2003 | 03-1573 |
GUCCI AM., INC. v. DAFFY'S, INC.United States Third Circuit
Intellectual Property, Trademark
Plaintiff unsuccessfully appeals the district court's denial of its request for an order compelling defendant to recall counterfeit handbags, and of...
|
12/31/2003 | 02-4046 |
DIA v. ASHCROFTUnited States Third Circuit
Constitutional Law, Immigration Law
Streamlining regulations promulgated to alleviate the crushing caseload faced by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) do not run afoul of the...
|
12/22/2003 | 02-2460 |
YOUNGBLOOD v. DEWEESEUnited States Third Circuit
Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Government Law
Two state Representatives' acts of allocating the General Assembly's office-staffing appropriation among individual Representatives was a legislative...
|
12/19/2003 | 03-1722 |
12/19/2003 | 01-4203 | |
BUTLER v. CITY OF CAMDENUnited States Third Circuit
Civil Rights
District court erred in denying plaintiff's request to question the venire panel regarding potential law enforcement bias, because there may have been...
|
12/18/2003 | 02-2903 |
NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO. v. RILEYUnited States Third Circuit
Contracts, Insurance Law
(Industry: Autos) Summary judgment was properly entered for plaintiff, who had no obligation to pay underinsured motorist benefits to defendant under her father's...
|
12/18/2003 | 00-1961 |
BOONE v. BARNHARTUnited States Third Circuit
Administrative Law, Government Benefits
Substantial evidence that plaintiff can perform a significant number of jobs that exist in the economy is lacking. Substantial evidence therefore does...
|
12/18/2003 | 02-3256 |
MCCURDY v. DODDUnited States Third Circuit
Constitutional Law, Family Law
A parent's interest in the companionship of his independent adult child is not a cognizable constitutional right protected by the Due Process Clause....
|
12/17/2003 | 02-2708 |
MUNROE v. ASHCROFTUnited States Third Circuit
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Immigration Law
Although plaintiff was ordered to pay less than $10,000 in restitution to the victim of his offense, the actual loss to the victim exceeded $10,000,...
|
12/16/2003 | 03-1471 |