Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - October 2005 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 9 of 9
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Drichas v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceThe court of appeals deletion of the trial court's deadly weapon finding is reversed where it misconstrued the standard for reviewing sufficiency of... |
10/19/2005 | 1915-04 |
Glazner v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceDenial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence is affirmed where the police officer acted reasonably based on facts known to him at the time he... |
10/19/2005 | 0998-04 |
Martin v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's conviction for sexual assault is affirmed over his claim that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting extraneous sexual-assault... |
10/05/2005 | 1545-04 |
Sorto v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDeath row inmate raised sixteen meritless points of error on direct appeal. |
10/05/2005 | 74, 836 |
Wilkerson v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, EvidenceA non-law enforcement state agent is not required to give Miranda warnings unless the agent is acting in tandem with police to investigate and gather... |
10/05/2005 | 1605-04 |
Penry v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's sentence is reversed where the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the issue of mental retardation. |
10/05/2005 | 74, 445 |
Haley v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDefendant's sentence for a drug conviction is reversed where victim-impact testimony was improperly admitted and substantially affected the jury's... |
10/05/2005 | 1531-03 |
Ex Parte KellerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas CorpusDefendant's subsequent conviction for indecency with a child does not make him ineligible for street-time credit for his earlier burglary offense. |
10/05/2005 | 75, 133 |
Romero v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Criminal Law & ProcedureA defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses is violated when a witness testifies in disguise. |
10/05/2005 | 0911-04 |
Results 1 to 9 of 9