Supreme Court of Delaware - September 2003 Opinion Summaries

  • Opinion Summary Search

    FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

    to Format is YYYYMMDD
  • Full Text Search
Page 1 of 1 Showing Result 1 - 6 of 6
Description Date Docket #

CROSSE v. BCBSD, INC.

Supreme Court of Delaware
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Health Law, Insurance Law
A non-profit health insurance company does not owe fiduciary duties to its plan participants, because the relationship between the insurer and each...
09/26/2003 10, 2003

IN RE ASBESTOS LITIG.

Supreme Court of Delaware
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment Law, Product Liability
Plaintiffs who were allegedly injured by asbestos exposure have adduced sufficient evidence to permit a jury to determine whether the defendant, the...
09/23/2003 704, 2002

SCHEERS v. INDEP. NEWSPAPERS

Supreme Court of Delaware
Attorney's Fees, Government Benefits, Injury & Tort Law
The Industrial Accident Board's determination, that claimant was entitled to partial, but not total, disability compensation benefits, was supported...
09/23/2003 199, 2003

PURNELL v. STATE

Supreme Court of Delaware
Criminal Law & Procedure
Where the purpose of a second non-consensual pat-down search was to gather evidence, not to protect officers, the second search violated the Fourth...
09/23/2003 671, 2002

IN THE MATTER OF DOUGHTY

Supreme Court of Delaware

Ethics & Disciplinary Code
09/23/2003 163, 2003

RHUDY v. BOTTLECAPS, INC.

Supreme Court of Delaware
Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real Estate
(Industry: Food & Beverage)

A bar owner did not owe a duty either to warn or to protect its patrons from criminal acts that occurred on another landowner's property.
09/04/2003 17/18, 2003
Copied to clipboard