Supreme Court of Delaware - September 2003 Opinion Summaries

Court:

Docket Number:

Legal Topic:

Party Name:

Industry:

Date:

Date Range: to Format is YYYYMMDD

Page 1 of 1 Showing Result 1 - 6 of 6

Description	Date	Docket #
CROSSE v. BCBSD, INC. Supreme Court of Delaware Corporation & Enterprise Law, Health Law, Insurance Law A non-profit health insurance company does not owe fiduciary duties to its plan participants, because the relationship between the insurer and each...	09/26/2003	10, 2003
IN THE MATTER OF DOUGHTY Supreme Court of Delaware Ethics & Disciplinary Code	09/23/2003	163, 2003
PURNELL v. STATE Supreme Court of Delaware Criminal Law & Procedure Where the purpose of a second non-consensual pat-down search was to gather evidence, not to protect officers, the second search violated the Fourth...	09/23/2003	671, 2002
SCHEERS v. INDEP. NEWSPAPERS Supreme Court of Delaware Attorney's Fees, Government Benefits, Injury & Tort Law The Industrial Accident Board's determination, that claimant was entitled to partial, but not total, disability compensation benefits, was supported...	09/23/2003	199, 2003
IN RE ASBESTOS LITIG. Supreme Court of Delaware Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment Law, Product Liability Plaintiffs who were allegedly injured by asbestos exposure have adduced sufficient evidence to permit a jury to determine whether the defendant, the...	09/23/2003	704, 2002
RHUDY v. BOTTLECAPS, INC. Supreme Court of Delaware Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real Estate A bar owner did not owe a duty either to warn or to protect its patrons from criminal acts that occurred on another landowner's property.	09/04/2003	17/18, 2003

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Opinion Summary Search