Supreme Court of California - April 2013 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 8 of 8
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
McWilliams v. City of Long BeachSupreme Court of California
Class Actions, Communications Law, Government Law, Tax LawJudgment of the Court of Appeals allowing suit challenging the defendant's telephone users tax (TUT) and seeking refund of the taxes paid to proceed,... |
04/25/2013 | S202037 |
People v. McCulloughSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Government LawA defendant who fails to contest the booking fee when the court imposes it forfeits the right to challenge it on appeal, and therefore the trial... |
04/22/2013 | S192513 |
People v. NucklesSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingA person who intentionally aids a parolee in absconding from parole supervision qualifies as an accessory under Penal Code section 32, and the Court... |
04/22/2013 | S200612 |
People v. ClanceySupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingIn defendant's challenge to the Court of Appeals determination that defendant's five-year sentence was the product of an unlawful judicial plea... |
04/18/2013 | S200158 |
People v. AnzaloneSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureNoncompliance with Penal Code section 1149, which requires the court to ask the jury foreperson or the jurors to affirm their verdict, is a procedural... |
04/15/2013 | S192536 |
People v. CarbajalSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureRetrial on the multiple sexual abuse victim allegation was not barred by double jeopardy, where: 1) the trial court departed from the procedures... |
04/08/2013 | S195600 |
People v. LeivaSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureIn the context of a summary revocation of probation, the tolling provision of Penal Code section 1203.2(a) preserves the trial court's authority to... |
04/08/2013 | S192176 |
People v. DelgadoSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureConviction of robbery and kidnapping for the purpose of robbery is affirmed, where: 1) the trial court was required to instruct on aiding and abetting... |
04/04/2013 | S192704 |
Results 1 to 8 of 8