Supreme Court of California - January 2004 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 2
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 11
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. BARRAGANSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingRetrial of a strike allegation is permissible where a trier of fact finds the allegation to be true, but an appellate court reverses that finding for... |
01/29/2004 | S105734 |
PEOPLE v. JOHNSONSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingA defendant is not entitled to Penal Code section 4019 presentence conduct credits for time served between original sentencing and resentencing as a... |
01/29/2004 | S113803 |
PEOPLE v. TONEYSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureWhen a magistrate at the preliminary hearing grants a defendant's second motion to suppress and then dismisses the case for insufficient evidence,... |
01/23/2004 | S104995 |
PEOPLE v. POSEYSupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & ProcedureVenue is a question of law for the court, to be decided prior to trial. |
01/22/2004 | S100360 |
PEOPLE v. MCCALLSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureHealth and Safety Code section 11383(f), which extends the prohibition on possessing hydriodic acid to include its essential chemicals, is a valid... |
01/15/2004 | S113433 |
ESTATE OF FORDSupreme Court of California
Family LawIn California, no equitable adoption is shown unless the parties' conduct and statements clearly and convincingly demonstrate an intent to adopt.... |
01/15/2004 | S105508 |
MACDONALD v. GUTIERREZSupreme Court of California
Administrative LawAt an administrative per se review hearing conducted by the DMV following a license suspension for driving under the influence, the DMV may consider... |
01/08/2004 | S111253 |
PEOPLE v. VALDEZSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingDefendant's conviction of first degree murder and of escape from custody is affirmed, as is the death penalty determination. |
01/06/2004 | S026872 |
IN RE QAWISupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Health LawA mentally disordered offender can be compelled to take antipsychotic medication in a nonemergency situation only if a court, at the time the offender... |
01/05/2004 | S100099 |
MULDER v. PILOT AIR FREIGHTSupreme Court of California
Injury & Tort LawPlaintiff's claims are barred by the absolute privilege established by Civil Code section 47(b), which bars tort actions based on privileged... |
01/05/2004 | S105483 |
Results 1 to 10 of 11