Supreme Court of California - December 2003 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 1
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 10
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
BONNELL v. MED. BD. OF CALIFORNIASupreme Court of California
Administrative Law, Government LawOnce a petition for reconsideration has been filed, Government Code section 11521(a) allows the state agency to place a maximum 10-day stay on its... |
12/30/2003 | S105798 |
PEOPLE v. SMITHSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & Procedure, SentencingThe doctrine of sentencing entrapment is rejected as inconsistent with California entrapment doctrine. Given that the conduct of the undercover... |
12/22/2003 | S108309 |
SHIVELY v. BOZANICHSupreme Court of California
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort LawThe discovery rule may not be employed to delay the accrual of a cause of action for defamation beyond the point at which the defamation is no longer... |
12/22/2003 | S094467 |
SAINT AGNES MED. CTR. v. PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIASupreme Court of California
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Health LawBertero v. Superior Court (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 213 is outdated and should be disapproved to the extent it holds that a party's repudiation of a... |
12/18/2003 | S111323 |
EASTBURN v. REGIONAL FIRE PROT. AUTH.Supreme Court of California
Health Law, Injury & Tort LawPublic entities employing emergency dispatchers are not subject to direct liability for injury attributable in part to a dispatcher's failure or delay... |
12/18/2003 | S107792 |
BETANCOURT v. STORKE HOUS. INVESTORSSupreme Court of California
ERISA, Labor & Employment LawERISA does not preempt a mechanic's lien action under Civ. Code section 3110 brought by laborers to recover unpaid contributions to their employee... |
12/15/2003 | S103942 |
PEOPLE v. PACIFIC BELLSupreme Court of California
False Advertising, Public UtilitiesThe California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) does not have exclusive jurisdiction over all actions against a public utility, and the mere... |
12/15/2003 | S099131 |
PEOPLE v. BUTLERSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureSince involuntary HIV testing is strictly limited by statute and Penal Code section 1202.1 conditions a testing order upon a finding of probable... |
12/01/2003 | S107791 |
PEOPLE v. STOWELLSupreme Court of California
Criminal Law & ProcedureA defendant who fails to object to the absence of an express finding of probable cause or docket notation will be precluded from appealing an HIV... |
12/01/2003 | S108187 |
SCHIFANDO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESSupreme Court of California
Labor & Employment LawAn employee need not exhaust both the administrative remedy that the California Fair Employment and Housing Act provides and the internal remedy that... |
12/01/2003 | S106660 |
Results 1 to 10 of 10