| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
People v. Super. Ct. of Tulare CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile Law
Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 707.1, defendant-juvenile's no contest plea in criminal court to a felony violation does not require...
|
10/19/2005 | F047953 |
County of Alameda v. Super. Ct. of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Property Law & Real Estate
In an inverse condemnation action, defendant-land developer may not proceed with its regulatory taking action before the County has the opportunity to...
|
10/18/2005 | A109576 |
In re ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Plaintiff's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where the Governor failed to consider specified factors, set forth in Penal Code section...
|
10/18/2005 | A108894 |
Lisa I. v. Super. Ct. of L.A.California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Family Law
A claimed biological father of a child born within 300 days of the mother's divorce from another man does not have standing under the Family Code...
|
10/18/2005 | B182219 |
People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
A jury, under Evidence Code section 1417, can compare an exemplar of a defendant's handwriting with handwriting on disputed documents to determine if...
|
10/18/2005 | B176354 |
Farmers Brothers Coffee v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal
Immigration Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' Compensation
Labor Code section 1171.5, which provides that immigration status is irrelevant to the issue of liability under state labor and employment laws, is...
|
10/17/2005 | B180839 |
In re Nancy C.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile Law
Defendant-juvenile's conviction for unlawfully taking a vehicle is remanded where the juvenile court failed to declare whether the violation was a...
|
10/17/2005 | C048636A |
Johnson v. Am. Standard, Inc.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Product Liability
In products liability cases, a manufacturer cannot be liable to a sophisticated user of its product, for failure to warn of a risk, if a sophisticated...
|
10/17/2005 | B179206 |
Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.California Court of Appeal
Tax Law
(Industry: Food & Beverage) In a tax refund action, the State Board of Equalization correctly ruled that the gain from plaintiff's sale of the stock of a wholly-owned subsidiary...
|
10/17/2005 | A107209 |
People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Defendant's sentence is remanded for correction where the trial court committed sentencing error by improperly increasing the sentence enhancement on...
|
10/14/2005 | B166502A |