California Court of Appeal - August 2005 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 8
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 76
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
Horsford v. Bd. of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Rights, Injury & Tort Law, Labor & Employment LawIn an employment discrimination action, the jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed over defendant's claim that plaintiffs did not suffer an... |
08/31/2005 | F037477 |
Coleman v. Republic Indemnity Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance LawAn insurer owes no duty of good faith and fair dealing to a third party claimant, notwithstanding the coincidental fact that the insurer also insures... |
08/31/2005 | B172638 |
Dell Merk, Inc. v. FranziaCalifornia Court of Appeal
Banking Law, Construction, ContractsIn a suit arising from a defaulted payment obligation for a construction contract, judgment against plaintiff-bank is affirmed over its claim that... |
08/31/2005 | C046171 |
Hartline v. Kaiser Found. Hosp.California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law, Workers' CompensationDismissal of plaintiff's vicarious liability claim is affirmed over his contention that the "premises line" rule from the area of workers'... |
08/31/2005 | C047905 |
San Joaquin County v. Joel E.California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Government LawA prospective conservatee does not have a constitutional or statutory right of self-representation in proceedings to appoint a conservator. |
08/31/2005 | C046017 |
Anthony J. v. Super. Ct. of L.A.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile LawDenial of reunification services, based on a father's abuse of his son's half siblings, is affirmed over his claim that Welfare and Institutions Code... |
08/31/2005 | B183285 |
People v. Maruice E.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile LawAn order adjudging defendant to be a ward of the court is affirmed over his claim that the juvenile court improperly continued the jurisdictional... |
08/31/2005 | A108654 |
McIndoe v. OlivosCalifornia Court of Appeal
A proposed contest to the validity of amendments to a trust would not violate the no contest clause of an exempt portion of the trust. |
08/31/2005 | D045285 |
People v. KeovilayphoneCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's conviction for rape is affirmed over his claim that the trial judge failed to provide sufficient guidance in response to a juror inquiry... |
08/31/2005 | C045357 |
People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureDefendant's drug conviction is affirmed over her claim that police violated her right to counsel under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436. |
08/30/2005 | G033973 |
Results 1 to 10 of 76