| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
VISHER v. MALIBUCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Government Law, Property Law & Real Estate
The trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss plaintiffs' petition for writ of mandate as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation where...
|
02/01/2005 | B173471 |
PEOPLE v. FOREMANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Forging or presenting a forged prescription to obtain drugs, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11368, does not fall under Proposition 36,...
|
02/01/2005 | A105691 |
VAN KLOMPENBURG v. BERGHOLDCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
A judgment enjoining defendant from maintaining gates across a private roadway easement owned by plaintiff is affirmed over defendant's contention...
|
02/01/2005 | C045417 |
CALIFORNIANS FOR DISABILITY RIGHTS v. MERVYN'SCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Rights, Consumer Protection Law
(Industry: Retail) Proposition 64, which imposes limits on private enforcement of unfair competition laws, does not apply to lawsuits filed before its effective date of...
|
02/01/2005 | A106199 |
MILLENNIUM CORP. SOLUTIONS v. PECKINPAUGHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Remedies, Sanctions, Trade Secrets
In a suit concerning the misappropriation of trade secrets, the grant of a preliminary injunction against plaintiff-brokerage firm is affirmed over...
|
02/01/2005 | B171217 |