| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. PESCADORCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
A judge, substituted into a trial following three days of testimony, can fairly and competently preside without first reading all prior testimony, as...
|
06/08/2004 | C042759 |
PEOPLE v. POSLOFCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Court denied defendant's appeal, which was based on alleged errors in jury instructions regarding the "willfulness" requirement of Penal Code Section...
|
06/07/2004 | E033503 |
PEOPLE v. MCHUGHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
In a DUI case, arrest otherwise reasonable under the Fourth Amendment does not become unreasonable for purposes of the exclusionary rule merely...
|
06/07/2004 | D042148 |
IN RE: WASIF M.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Juvenile Law
There was sufficient evidence to establish juvenile defendant's violation of Penal Code section 219.2, which requires the specific intent to strike or...
|
06/04/2004 | B166776 |
PEOPLE v. ARJONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The trial court did not err in refusing to hear a Renewed Section 995 Motion, nor did the denial result in any prejudice to the plaintiff.
|
06/04/2004 | B164650 |
IN RE: PEOPLE v. VERONIQUE P.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Juvenile Law
Despite the trial court's error in relying on a written form in gaining a confession, the record clearly supports a finding that the juvenile...
|
06/04/2004 | F043917 |
PEOPLE v. STEWARTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Defendant was wrongly sentenced to three life terms because all three offenses were committed against a single victim during a single occasion....
|
06/03/2004 | C040094 |
LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal
Communications Law, Contracts
Court found there was a triable issue of fact as to whether Defendant Phone Company was guilty of fraudulent concealment by failing to disclose...
|
06/03/2004 | C043320 |
KILROY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Government Law
Factual findings in a prior judicial opinion are not a proper subject of judicial notice. Governmental immunity applies to actions of CHP officer,...
|
06/02/2004 | C044877 |