| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
BFGC ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC. v. FORCUM/MACKEY CONSTR., INCCalifornia Court of Appeal
Construction, Contracts
In a construction contract dispute, the lower court did not err by holding that plaintiff's claims for implied indemnity required a predicate tort.
|
06/22/2004 | G032543 |
PALACIN v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
Court properly sustained defendant's demurrer stating there was no insurance coverage for water damage incurred by the plaintiff condominium owner,...
|
06/22/2004 | D042813 |
IN RE: SCOTTCalifornia Court of Appeal
Habeas Corpus
Court granted defendant's habeas petition, ordering the parole board to grant plaintiff a new hearing, because there was substantial evidence...
|
06/22/2004 | A103320 |
PEOPLE v. PIRWANICalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Evidence
Trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting elderly decedent's hearsay statements in a criminal trial because Evidence Code section 1380,...
|
06/21/2004 | H025395 |
CITY OF ANAHEIM v. PAC. BELL TELEPHONE CO.California Court of Appeal
Public Utilities
Court found the PUC had exclusive jurisdiction over the controversy surrounding a local ordinance requiring public utilities to move overhead wires...
|
06/21/2004 | G029261 |
PEOPLE v. COTTLECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Defendant successfully argued for a new trial on the basis the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to reopen jury selection to exercise one of...
|
06/21/2004 | C043594 |
PEOPLE v. SALASCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Securities Law
Defendants convicted of selling unqualified securities succeeded in gaining a new trail based on the convicting court's improper failure to inform the...
|
06/21/2004 | B159750 |
CITY OF ST. HELENA v. PUB. UTILITIES COMM'NCalifornia Court of Appeal
Public Utilities, Transportation
Court found the Napa Valley Wine Train does not qualify as a common carrier providing transportation, and is not subject to regulation as a public...
|
06/21/2004 | A104466 |
SOUKUP v. STOCKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees
Appellate court amended its earlier opinion, changing the disposition. The court altered its opinion regarding the extent to which a lawyer who...
|
06/21/2004 | B154311 |
PEOPLE v. OVERBYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Defendant's conviction was affirmed, despite claims that the trial court reseated a juror as a remedy for a Batson-Wheeler violation without...
|
06/21/2004 | B166718 |