California Court of Appeal - June 2004 Opinion Summaries

  • Opinion Summary Search

    FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

    to Format is YYYYMMDD
  • Full Text Search
Page 4 of 7 Showing Result 31 - 40 of 69
Description Date Docket #

BFGC ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC. v. FORCUM/MACKEY CONSTR., INC

California Court of Appeal
Construction, Contracts
In a construction contract dispute, the lower court did not err by holding that plaintiff's claims for implied indemnity required a predicate tort.
06/22/2004 G032543

PALACIN v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

California Court of Appeal
Insurance Law, Property Law & Real Estate
Court properly sustained defendant's demurrer stating there was no insurance coverage for water damage incurred by the plaintiff condominium owner,...
06/22/2004 D042813

IN RE: SCOTT

California Court of Appeal
Habeas Corpus
Court granted defendant's habeas petition, ordering the parole board to grant plaintiff a new hearing, because there was substantial evidence...
06/22/2004 A103320

PEOPLE v. PIRWANI

California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Evidence
Trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting elderly decedent's hearsay statements in a criminal trial because Evidence Code section 1380,...
06/21/2004 H025395

CITY OF ANAHEIM v. PAC. BELL TELEPHONE CO.

California Court of Appeal
Public Utilities
Court found the PUC had exclusive jurisdiction over the controversy surrounding a local ordinance requiring public utilities to move overhead wires...
06/21/2004 G029261

PEOPLE v. COTTLE

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Defendant successfully argued for a new trial on the basis the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to reopen jury selection to exercise one of...
06/21/2004 C043594

PEOPLE v. SALAS

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Securities Law
Defendants convicted of selling unqualified securities succeeded in gaining a new trail based on the convicting court's improper failure to inform the...
06/21/2004 B159750

CITY OF ST. HELENA v. PUB. UTILITIES COMM'N

California Court of Appeal
Public Utilities, Transportation
Court found the Napa Valley Wine Train does not qualify as a common carrier providing transportation, and is not subject to regulation as a public...
06/21/2004 A104466

SOUKUP v. STOCK

California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees
Appellate court amended its earlier opinion, changing the disposition. The court altered its opinion regarding the extent to which a lawyer who...
06/21/2004 B154311

PEOPLE v. OVERBY

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Defendant's conviction was affirmed, despite claims that the trial court reseated a juror as a remedy for a Batson-Wheeler violation without...
06/21/2004 B166718
Copied to clipboard