| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. ORABUENACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
The trial court has the discretion under Penal Code section 1385 to dismiss a non-drug-use-related misdemeanor, of which defendant was convicted in...
|
02/25/2004 | H025987 |
PEOPLE v. SENECA INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure, Insurance Law
Sureties who move for an extension of the 185-day period in which a criminal defendant can be returned to custody in order to avoid bail forfeiture...
|
02/25/2004 | B166414 |
PEOPLE v. BLACKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus
Defendant's nolo contendere plea may not be set aside even though it was entered more than 60 days after the district court's conditional order of...
|
02/25/2004 | B166421 |
FRIEMAN v. SAN RAFAEL ROCK QUARRY, INC.California Court of Appeal
Class Actions, Injury & Tort Law, Property Law & Real Estate
In this action alleging nuisance and violations of the Unfair Practices Act, the denial of a motion for class certification of Marin County residents...
|
02/24/2004 | A101294 |
CORAL CONSTR., INC. v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Construction, Government Contracts
Plaintiff, intending to bid on city contracts and having regularly bid on such contracts in the past, had standing to challenge the constitutionality...
|
02/24/2004 | A101842 |
ROTH v. L.A. DOOR CO.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' Compensation
Plaintiff's employer, as an authorized self-insurer for the purpose of providing workers' compensation insurance, is deemed an "insurer" providing...
|
02/23/2004 | G031221 |
CITY OF SARATOGA v. HINZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Property Law & Real Estate, Transportation
Defendant unsuccessfully appeals a judgment rejecting his challenges to plaintiff's resolution of necessity condemning an easement over a portion of...
|
02/20/2004 | H023549 |
MCKESSON HBOC, INC. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY (STATE OF OREGON)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Evidence, Securities Law
Under California law, when plaintiff shared various privileged documents with the government, it waived the attorney-client privilege and the...
|
02/20/2004 | A103055 |
MORGAN v. CITY OF CHINOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Landlord Tenant Law, Property Law & Real Estate
In considering whether to grant a rent increase at plaintiff's mobilehome park, due process and defendant's rent control ordinance merely required the...
|
02/20/2004 | E032414 |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA v. THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Government Law, Public Utilities
Plaintiff's action for refund of allegedly excessive water and sewer charges was correctly deemed to be time-barred by the 120-day limitations period...
|
02/19/2004 | A101716 |