California Court of Appeal - December 2003 Opinion Summaries

  • Opinion Summary Search

    FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

    to Format is YYYYMMDD
  • Full Text Search
Page 1 of 9 Showing Result 1 - 10 of 82
Description Date Docket #

PEOPLE v. CARBAJAL

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Conviction for indecent exposure, Pen. Code section 314(1) is valid where there is no evidence that anyone actually saw defendant's naked genitals, as...
12/31/2003 G031514

ESPINOZA v. CLASSIC PIZZA, INC.

California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law
In an action over overtime wages, the judgment in favor of plaintiff is remanded to recalculate plaintiff's gross weekly salaries, overtime hours...
12/31/2003 G030406

TAXARA v. GUTIERREZ

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 1219.3 does not require a single officer to observe the breath test subject for 15 minutes prior to...
12/30/2003 C043125

CITI-WIDE PREFERRED COURIERS, INC. v. GOLDEN EAGLE INS. CORP.

California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Workers' Compensation
Just as a malicious prosecution suit may be maintained where only one of several claims in the underlying action lacked probable cause, so too can a...
12/30/2003 B160823

PEOPLE v. HAMILTON

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Remedies
Neither payments to the victim by the victim's insurance carrier nor payments to the victim by the insurer of defendant's mother may offset...
12/30/2003 B167189

STOLMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate, Property Law & Real Estate
The zoning administrator abused her discretion in granting a variance permitting the addition of an automobile detailing service to an existing...
12/30/2003 B164169

PEOPLE v. WILSON

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Defendant unsuccessfully appeals from his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol causing bodily injury.
12/30/2003 A102208

PEOPLE v. RENDEROS

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Penal Code section 803(g) does not violate ex post facto principles when it is used to extend the unexpired time in which criminal charges may be...
12/30/2003 A097873, A103588

PEOPLE v. MEDINA

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Evidence of a sexual offense for which defendant was not charged was admissible pursuant to Evidence Code section 1108 even though it occurred many...
12/30/2003 D041113

PEOPLE v. RIVERA

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Because Penal Code section 417(b) applies only to proscribed conduct occurring on the grounds of a day care center or other youth facility,...
12/29/2003 G031469, G031642