California Court of Appeal - July 2003 Opinion Summaries

  • Opinion Summary Search

    FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

    to Format is YYYYMMDD
  • Full Text Search
Page 2 of 9 Showing Result 11 - 20 of 89
Description Date Docket #

PEOPLE v. CORYELL

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Evidence supported a carjacking conviction as defendant used force or fear to gain possession of the vehicle by frightening both victims away, and no...
07/30/2003 E030693

SHADDOX v. BERTANI

California Court of Appeal
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law
A dentist's communication with a police officer's superiors, advising of the dentist's suspicion that the officer was abusing prescription drugs, was...
07/30/2003 A097480

HARNEDY v. WHITTY

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
When litigation involves claims of misfeasance on the part of a trustee and third parties, a beneficiary had standing to sue to undo a transaction...
07/30/2003 A099722

EVANS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (PEOPLE)

California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
No legal necessity existed to discharge an empanelled jury where the trial court dismissed a juror and the parties were unwilling to proceed without a...
07/30/2003 D041204

DENLINGER v. CHINADOTCOM CORP.

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, International Law
Article 10(a) of The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters allows service of...
07/30/2003 H024577

SAN JOSE PARKING, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY (CITY OF SAN JOSE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Government Law, Property Law & Real Estate
An Exclusive Negotiations and Operating Agreement did not grant an operator and manager of a parking lot any real property interest in the parking...
07/30/2003 H024871

DAVCON, INC. V. ROBERTS & MORGAN

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
A request to disqualify a judge took effect instantly, thus there was no period of suspension to toll the period to act on a judgment notwithstanding...
07/30/2003 E030006

HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS' ASS'N v. COUNTY OF ORANGE (CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)

California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Elections, Property Law & Real Estate, Tax Law
Excess taxation for the added retirement benefits mandated in a voter-approved city charter violated Proposition 13, prohibiting the imposition of ad...
07/30/2003 G029292

MCKEE v. ORANGE UNIFIED SCH. DIST.

California Court of Appeal
Government Law
A citizen of the State of California is an "interested person" within the meaning of Government Code sections 54960 and 54960.1, and may sue a...
07/30/2003 G030931

SHEA HOMES LTD. P'SHIP v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Measure D, which revises the urban growth boundary of eastern Alameda County, 1) does not violate the single-subject rule, 2) does not violate state...
07/29/2003 A097072, A097387, A097454
Copied to clipboard