| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPEL v. HENDERSONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Because Pen. Code section 1202.45 became effective after defendant committed the crimes, the trial court erred in imposing the parole revocation fine....
|
04/02/2003 | E029887 |
HARBOR ISLAND HOLDINGS, L.L.C. v. KIMCalifornia Court of Appeal
Contracts, Landlord Tenant Law, Property Law & Real Estate
A residential lease provision for doubled rent in the event of a breach was unenforceable as a penalty.
|
04/02/2003 | G030264 |
PEOPLE v. WHITECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Transportation
Officer's error of law, that Arizona issues two license plates per car, though made in good faith, cannot form the basis for a vehicle stop. Evidence...
|
04/01/2003 | A094900, A096512 |
CORONA v. AMHERST PARTNERSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
Where a party is required by contract to submit a dispute to binding arbitration, but does not request that the arbitrator decide his entitlement to...
|
04/01/2003 | D040084 |
PEOPLE v. SMITHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence
Even if the mixed sample deoxyribonucleic acid evidence was improperly admitted, any resultant error was harmless, and defendant's forcible rape...
|
04/01/2003 | B153102 |
PEOPEL v. ESPARZACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Defendant was ineligible for Proposition 36 treatment on a nondrug-related felony, even though the drug possession felony was the cause of his...
|
04/01/2003 | C040863 |