| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (MALCOLM)California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Contracts, Legal Malpractice
Defendant's claimed damages of legal fees he spent in an unsuccessful attempt to overturn a settlement do not represent possible tort damages, thus...
|
04/11/2003 | A101737 |
PEOPLE v. LANGSTONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
The trial court improperly found true a one-year prior prison term enhancement for defendant's 1994 escape conviction, thus the sentencing enhancement...
|
04/10/2003 | C037845 |
IN RE: C.C.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Juvenile Law
A juvenile court has the authority to deny reunification services to a parent who refuses to comply with a valid court order for a psychological...
|
04/10/2003 | E032112 |
SHAMSIAN v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Environmental Law, Oil and Gas Law
Plaintiffs' cause of action under Health and Safety Code section 25249.7, of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, is barred by...
|
04/10/2003 | B157698 |
PEOPLE v. SPENCECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
On remand from the Cal. Sup. Ct., the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply to a probation search conducted by police officers...
|
04/10/2003 | C028033 |
KING v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY (PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The trial court's order of forfeiture of counsel is reversed where defendant's attorney not only did not represent defendant's interests, but argued...
|
04/09/2003 | C039495 |
GERMINO v. HILLYERCalifornia Court of Appeal
Probate, Trusts & Estates
Notice to trustees pursuant to Probate Code section 16061.7 was adequate to commence the limitations period established by section 16061.8, and the...
|
04/09/2003 | F041268 |
DRUM v. BLEAU, FOX & ASSOCS.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Legal Malpractice
Trial court erred in granting a motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute because plaintiff has established a prima facie case for abuse of...
|
04/09/2003 | B154970 |
PALMER v. REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal
Education Law, Labor & Employment Law
In a common law action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, summary judgment in favor of employer, based on plaintiff's failure to...
|
04/08/2003 | B154868 |
HEYMAN v. FRANCHISE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORP.California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Where there is no evidence of an elaborate conspiracy to keep records and information related the profitability of franchisee loans and the financial...
|
04/08/2003 | G030352 |