| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (ISENHOWER)California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Injury & Tort Law, Government Law
The trial court abused its discretion in relieving claimants from the six-month deadline to file a government claim under Gov. Code section 911.2,...
|
01/07/2003 | C042168 |
PEOPLE v. DAVISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
An order lifting a stay of a two-year prison sentence improperly deprived defendant of the benefits of Proposition 36, as the trial court's only...
|
01/07/2003 | C040635 |
DENNY'S, INC. v. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law, Workers' Compensation
An employee's injury claim was outside a guarantor's indemnification responsibility, where the employer made the business decision to opt for...
|
01/07/2003 | F039621 |
ELYAOUDAYAN v. HOFFMANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
A party who agrees to a settlement in writing outside the presence of the court may enforce it against a party who agreed to the same settlement...
|
01/03/2003 | B157202 |
IN RE ANTOINETTE S.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Indian Law, Juvenile Law
A juvenile court's failure to comply with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act is not a jurisdictional error, and does not require...
|
01/02/2003 | G030583 |
IN RE CRUZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus
Factual findings made in an order in a habeas corpus proceeding have no collateral estoppel effect limiting a subsequent retrial of the criminal...
|
01/02/2003 | B154156 |