| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
IN RE EDDIE M.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Juvenile Law
Welfare & Institutions Code amended section 777 may be used to initiate proceedings to impose a more restrictive placement based on any violation...
|
08/06/2002 | B151521 |
UPLAND ANESTHESIA MED. GROUP v. THE DOCTOR'S CO.California Court of Appeal
Health Law, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Professional Malpractice
A medical group was precluded from an insurance defense under the intentional acts exclusion, where allegations related to the rendering or failure to...
|
08/05/2002 | E029969 |
PEOPLE v. ALVAREZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Dismissal of continuing sexual abuse counts, and sentencing on lewd conduct counts was proper under Penal Code section 288.5(c). Application of the...
|
08/05/2002 | B153035 |
PEOPLE v. VERLINDECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Convictions for gross vehicular manslaughter are affirmed where 1) any error in failing to instruct on accomplice status and credibility was harmless...
|
08/05/2002 | D037142 |
IN RE JOHNNY M.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Education Law, Juvenile Law
Welfare & Institutions Code section 730.6 justifies an order that a juvenile reimburse a school district for salaried district employees' labor...
|
08/05/2002 | B154810 |
MCCABE v. AM. HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law, Transportation, Product Liability
Plaintiff raised triable issues as to whether a car airbag is the kind of product about which consumers can form minimum safety expectations under the...
|
08/05/2002 | B151816 |
PARDEE CONSTR. CO. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (RODRIGUEZ)California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Property Law & Real Estate
Home-purchase agreements were adhesive contracts both procedurally and substantively unconscionable, as were provisions therein, requiring the parties...
|
08/02/2002 | D039273 |
DEP'T OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL APPEALS BD. (DELUZE)California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Commercial Law
The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control rationally concluded that a winegrower's payment for advertising in a retail licensee's catalog violated...
|
08/02/2002 | A096928 |
EVEREST INVESTORS 8 v. WHITEHALL REAL ESTATE LTD. P'SHIP XICalifornia Court of Appeal
Corporation & Enterprise Law, Injury & Tort Law
A nonfiduciary defendant, neither an agent nor an employee of the fiduciary, cannot be liable for conspiring with the fiduciary to breach a fiduciary...
|
08/02/2002 | B150981 |
DEP'T OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL APPEALS BD. OF CALIFORNIA (4805 CONVOY, INC.)California Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Commercial Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
A police officer's conduct, in asking an exotic dancer whether her next dance would involve "more skin", did not amount to entrapment as a matter of...
|
08/02/2002 | D039443 |