| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
PEOPLE v. FLORESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Where the defendant was ordered to pay $5,000 to court-appointed counsel, and such order was made without notice and hearing, the order was remanded...
|
03/08/2002 | B148379 |
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Where defendant law firm accepted representation of a client in a transactional matter similar to one in which it had previously represented the...
|
03/08/2002 | B123313 |
KIMBERLY R. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV. AGENCY)California Court of Appeal
Family Law
The Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) may not unilaterally dismiss a supplemental petition it filed to remove a dependent child from a parent's...
|
03/08/2002 | D039117 |
WINTER v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law
The probationary period for a Los Angeles police officer was not extended by the period of time he was assigned home while a complaint against him was...
|
03/08/2002 | B148898 |
WEST v. BECHTEL CORP.California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law
Where employer was not shown to have discriminated on the basis of the plaintiff's age, and the employer offered the plaintiff several positions...
|
03/07/2002 | A089492 |
HEENAN v. SOBATICalifornia Court of Appeal
Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
A sitting superior court judge may not conduct a private arbitration subject to confirmation under the California Arbitration Act.
|
03/07/2002 | G028961 |
PEOPLE v. MOODYCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Penal Code section 1170.11 commands that an enhancement pursuant to section 12022.53 is subject to the one-third limitation of section 1170.1.
|
03/07/2002 | C037797 |
COUNTY OF ORANGE v. SMITHCalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law
Where a father is voluntarily absent from his child's life for a period of 13 years, the defense of laches is not available as a defense to payment of...
|
03/06/2002 | G026359 |
SHAPIRO v. SAN DIEGO CITY COUNCILCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate, Government Law
The trial court was well within its authority when it granted an injunction that would require the city council's fuller disclosure, pursuant to the...
|
03/05/2002 | D037323 |
PEOPLE v. KOZLOWSKICalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
A PIN code constitutes property for purposes of kidnapping for extortion; a $50,000 restitution fine against the defendants was in excess of the...
|
03/04/2002 | A091586 |