| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CHEN v. COUNTY OF ORANGECalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law
The dismissal of a former district attorney's suit claiming marital status discrimination and retaliation by D.A.'s office was affirmed because mere...
|
02/15/2002 | G027307 |
PEOPLE v. SNOWCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Child molester defendant's conviction for a current single underlying offense, coupled with the true findings on his prior convictions, permits a...
|
02/15/2002 | D035655 |
CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (DAVENPORT)California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Although a criminal defendant's right to confidentiality must be protected in proceedings held pursuant to Evidence Code section 1043, whenever...
|
02/15/2002 | B153002 |
PEOPLE v. JOHNSONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Because Pen. Code section 667.61(f) precludes the life term imposed under section 667.61 from being doubled under the three strikes law, and section...
|
02/14/2002 | D035346 |
PEOPLE v. SUGARMANCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Highway patrol officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment by requiring plaintiff to take a blood test at a hospital after he frustrated the...
|
02/14/2002 | B148414 |
PHILLIPS v. ST. MARY REG-L MED. CTR.California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law
Where plaintiff claimed that defendant violated the public policy set forth in the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), article I, section 8 of the...
|
02/14/2002 | E029143 |
PEOPLE v. HAYKELCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Because assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury is not listed as a serious felony under Penal Code section 1192.7(c), a...
|
02/13/2002 | G028079 |
PEOPLE v. MCNAMEECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
Penal Code section 2933.2 bars presentence conduct credits against the determinate part of a sentence as well as the indeterminate part.
|
02/11/2002 | E028823 |
IN RE: MARIBEL T.California Court of Appeal
Family Law, Juvenile Law
Where the written custody order failed to conform to the juvenile court's oral order and imposed additional removal conditions that were not even...
|
02/11/2002 | B150399 |
PEOPLE v. INIGUEZCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing
The inconsistency in required mental states, between simultaneously intending to do and not do the same act, makes the purported conspiracy to commit...
|
02/11/2002 | C037230 |