California Court of Appeal - December 2001 Opinion Summaries

  • Opinion Summary Search

    FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD

    to Format is YYYYMMDD
  • Full Text Search
Page 1 of 7 Showing Result 1 - 10 of 70
Description Date Docket #

TUCKER LAND CO. v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

California Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Constituent members of a Joint Powers Agency (JPA), created by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Government Code section 6500 et seq., are not...
12/28/2001 B146384

BURNS v. NATURE'S BEST

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
An instruction that precludes the jury from considering whether a plaintiff had an expectation that a taped telephone conversation would be repeated...
12/28/2001 G023339

IN RE: MARRIAGE OF VROENEN

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
The defense of estoppel based on concealment of children is not available if the concealment ended when the children were still minors.
12/27/2001 A094067

LOHNES v. ASTRON COMPUTER PRODUCTS

California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
Intervener-s reliance on and compliance with the court clerk-s accepted practice, cannot serve as a basis for the court-s order striking the complaint...
12/27/2001 G025519

CPI BUILDERS, INC. v. IMPCO TECH, INC.

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
A binding contract to arbitrate is valid where one party signs the document but withdraws its consent after the other party accepts the offer.
12/27/2001 G026579

IN RE: MARRIAGE OF CROSS

California Court of Appeal
Family Law
Neither husband nor the community has a right to reimbursement from improvements made to wife's seperate property made with his seperate funds.
12/27/2001 E029861

HAMEID v. NAT'L FIRE INS. OF HARTFORD

California Court of Appeal
Contracts, Insurance Law
Insurance company has a duty to defend under an advertising injury provision of a policy, even if the advertising in question is small.
12/27/2001 G026525

PEOPLE v. ENG

California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
The Coast Guard's below-deck search of a boat conducted pursuant to a "search and rescue" does not violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights.
12/27/2001 A094853

ESTATE OF KAILA

California Court of Appeal
Evidence
Extrinsic evidence is admissable to show ambiguities and interpret no-contest clauses in wills.
12/27/2001 D036065

JACKSON v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

California Court of Appeal
Public Utilities
A utility is immune, under Civil Code section 846, from suit by a child who suffered injuries when he attempted to retrieve his kite from an overhead...
12/26/2001 A091784