| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
WALKER v. KIOUSISCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law
Civil Code section 47.5, which allows a peace officer to bring a defamation action against an individual who knowingly and maliciously files a false...
|
11/28/2001 | E029822 |
BREWER v. FEDERICICalifornia Court of Appeal
Family Law
Under Family Code section 2122, disclosure of a substantial community property asset's value as "unknown" will justify setting aside a stipulated or...
|
11/28/2001 | B135155 |
VAHLE v. BARWICKCalifornia Court of Appeal
Professional Malpractice
General release in personal injury case that releases "all other persons" does not, for summary judgment purposes, release the plaintiff's counsel...
|
11/27/2001 | A093671 |
PROVENZANO v. DEP'T OF MOTOR VEHICLESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Antitrust & Trade Regulation
Vehicle Code 11705(a)(14) applies to car salespersons in addition to manufacturers, transporters and dealers and allows the DMV to revoke a car...
|
11/27/2001 | D036898 |
COASTAL BERRY CO. v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BD.California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law
Strike misconduct is "serious" and justifying dismissal or denial of reinstatement of employees if "it reasonably tends to coerce or intimidate"...
|
11/27/2001 | H021585 |
NAM TAI ELECS., INC. v. TITZERCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Cyberspace Law
Out-of-state defendant's posting on message board, whose servers were administered in state of California, is not sufficient to convey personal...
|
11/26/2001 | B149382 |
PEOPLE v. VIRAMONTESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
In murder case where there was conflicting testimony on who fired first, defendant's entitlement to perfect self-defense jury instruction did not...
|
11/26/2001 | B143288 |
PEOPLE v. SIMMONSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Proposition 21, Welfare and Institutions Code section 707(d), does not violate the single subject rule, the separation of powers doctrine, or...
|
11/26/2001 | C036269 |
PEOPLE v. RANGER INS. CO.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Penal Code section 1166 does not apply to bond forfeiture cases that were resolved by plea agreement.
|
11/26/2001 | B145348 |
PEOPLE v. DANGCalifornia Court of Appeal
Evidence
Evidence Code 956.5, which governs attorney-client privilege, does not apply to defendant who threatens witnesses in presence of his counsel.
|
11/26/2001 | B145393 |