| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
VENTURA UNIFIED SCH. DIST. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (LOPEZ)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
Under Code Civ. Proc. 394, a public entity may move to change venue to the county where it is located within thirty days after dismissal of another...
|
10/02/2001 | B151325 |
SHANNON v. RHODESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law
The doctrine of primary assumption of risk does not apply to bar the negligence claim of a passenger in a boat simply being used to ride around on a...
|
10/02/2001 | F035671 |
NASH v. MACDONALDCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Under Code of Civil Procedure 337.15, a construction defect in an access road is a latent defect rather than a patent one where even an expert could...
|
10/02/2001 | A090825 |
THAYER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.California Court of Appeal
Attorney's Fees, Class Actions
Defendant's willingness to concede liability and enter into settlement negotiations soon after counsel filed complaints defeats a lodestar multiplier...
|
10/02/2001 | A090429 |
PEOPLE v. HARRISONCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure
Vexatious litigant statutes, Code Civ. Proc. 391 et seq., apply only to civil action or proceeding, and section 9 of the Penal Code does not make them...
|
10/01/2001 | F022835 |
PEOPLE v. VALENZUELACalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Penal Code section 466.5(b), possession of a master key with the intent to commit an unlawful act, does not require proof that the defendant knew that...
|
10/01/2001 | E029624 |