| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
THE PEOPLE ex rel. DEP'T OF TRANSP. v. MALDONADOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Property Law & Real Estate
Under the Outdoor Advertising Act, Bus. & Prof. Code, 5200 et seq., a billboard does not qualify as an "on-premises" display if it adverstises...
|
02/08/2001 | A089538 |
PEOPLE v. CARLISLECalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Criminal defendant who repeatedly stated he wanted to represent himself if he couldn't have another attorney appointed for him, expressed an...
|
02/08/2001 | B137310 |
BAME v. CITY OF DEL MARCalifornia Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law
State agricultural district's sovereign immunity extends to entities contracting with the district that operate consumer exhibitions and...
|
02/08/2001 | D034206 |
PEOPLE v. QUINNCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
A mentally retarded person who is a danger to himself or to others may be committed to the State Department of Developmental Services under Welfare...
|
02/07/2001 | B139439 |
CHERRY v. SUPERIOR COURT (THE PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
Even after the US Supreme Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 US 466, double jeopardy does not bar retrial of a prior conviction...
|
02/07/2001 | B144293 |
DROUET v. SUPERIOR COURT (BROUSTIS)California Court of Appeal
Landlord Tenant Law
A tenant facing eviction under the Ellis Act, Gov. Code 7060 et seq., may not raise an affirmative defense of retaliatory eviction under Civil Code...
|
02/07/2001 | A092016 |
MANDULEY v. SUPERIOR COURT (THE PEOPLE)California Court of Appeal
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure
Proposition 21, which permits the prosecuting authority to file certain criminal accusations against juveniles in either adult criminal court or...
|
02/07/2001 | D036356 |
ADAMS v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORP.California Court of Appeal
Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Lawyer, whose former law firm rendered legal advice to defendant, may represent plaintiffs against that defendant if he performed no work for the...
|
02/07/2001 | C031323 |
ZILOG, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT (PAC. INDEM. CO.)California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure
For purposes of determining the time limit for preemptory challenge to a judge under Government Code section 68616, a trial court that retains all...
|
02/07/2001 | H021144 |
PEOPLE v. BUICalifornia Court of Appeal
Evidence
An expert witness' novel theory on how methamphetamine consumption affected driving ability in vehicular manslaughter trial is admissible because the...
|
02/07/2001 | C029902 |