| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
CONLEY v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Injury & Tort Law
Church is not immune from defamation suit filed by priest, who accused another priest of child abuse under the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act,...
|
12/29/2000 | A087880 |
GARCETTI v. SUPER. CT.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure
Under the Sexually Violent Predators Act, Welf. & Inst. Code, 6600 et seq., a conviction of an attempted lewd or lascivious act upon a child under...
|
12/29/2000 | B141817 |
GAROFALO v. PRINCESS CRUISESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Admiralty, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law
The Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C. 761 et seq, preempts an employer-s state law claim in a subrogation action to recover from a third party...
|
12/29/2000 | B127126 |
FRANKLIN v. 7-ELEVEN OWNERSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Corporation & Enterprise Law
Doctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction justifies injunction on litigation of class action in one state court where similar action in another...
|
12/29/2000 | A085722 |
7-ELEVEN OWNERS v. SOUTHLAND CORP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Corporation & Enterprise Law
Mere failure to complete discovery will not make a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit unfair.
|
12/29/2000 | A083037 |
SPANISH SPEAKING CITIZENS- v. LOWCalifornia Court of Appeal
Insurance Law
Current regulations on charging car insurance premiums comply with Insurance Code section 1861.02, subdivision (a).
|
12/29/2000 | A084024 |
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON v. PUCCalifornia Court of Appeal
Public Utilities
A tariff that does not increase rates become effective by operation of law 40 days after filing pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 455 and the...
|
12/29/2000 | B137693 |
TOMASSI v. SCARFFCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law
Since an insurer of defendant in wrongful death lawsuit is not an "aggrieved party" under Code of Civil Procedure section 663, it lacks standing to...
|
12/28/2000 | H019019 |
IN RE: MARRIAGE OF ASKMOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Family Law
A trial court may grant a respondent-s request for spousal support and attorneys' fees in a divorce proceeding, under Family Code section 3600, even...
|
12/28/2000 | B133807 |
SILVA v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Evidence, Injury & Tort Law
Trial court may not rule on railroad's duty to fence off its tracks in a motion in limine, but only when it has a clear factual or evidentiary basis...
|
12/28/2000 | A088552 |