California Court of Appeal - December 2000 Opinion Summaries
Page 1 of 6
Showing Result 1 - 10 of 55
| Description | Date | Docket # |
|---|---|---|
GARCETTI v. SUPER. CT.California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & ProcedureUnder the Sexually Violent Predators Act, Welf. & Inst. Code, 6600 et seq., a conviction of an attempted lewd or lascivious act upon a child under... |
12/29/2000 | B141817 |
GAROFALO v. PRINCESS CRUISESCalifornia Court of Appeal
Admiralty, Injury & Tort Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment LawThe Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C. 761 et seq, preempts an employer-s state law claim in a subrogation action to recover from a third party... |
12/29/2000 | B127126 |
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON v. PUCCalifornia Court of Appeal
Public UtilitiesA tariff that does not increase rates become effective by operation of law 40 days after filing pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 455 and the... |
12/29/2000 | B137693 |
CONLEY v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure, Injury & Tort LawChurch is not immune from defamation suit filed by priest, who accused another priest of child abuse under the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act,... |
12/29/2000 | A087880 |
7-ELEVEN OWNERS v. SOUTHLAND CORP.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Corporation & Enterprise LawMere failure to complete discovery will not make a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit unfair. |
12/29/2000 | A083037 |
FRANKLIN v. 7-ELEVEN OWNERSCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Corporation & Enterprise LawDoctrine of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction justifies injunction on litigation of class action in one state court where similar action in another... |
12/29/2000 | A085722 |
SPANISH SPEAKING CITIZENS- v. LOWCalifornia Court of Appeal
Insurance LawCurrent regulations on charging car insurance premiums comply with Insurance Code section 1861.02, subdivision (a). |
12/29/2000 | A084024 |
TOSCO CORP. v. GEN. INS. CO. OF AMERICACalifornia Court of Appeal
Insurance LawA comprehensive general liability insurer may not be required to defend or indemnify an insured with respect to liabilities arising from property that... |
12/28/2000 | A082765 |
SILVA v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO.California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Evidence, Injury & Tort LawTrial court may not rule on railroad's duty to fence off its tracks in a motion in limine, but only when it has a clear factual or evidentiary basis... |
12/28/2000 | A088552 |
IN RE: MARRIAGE OF ASKMOCalifornia Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Family LawA trial court may grant a respondent-s request for spousal support and attorneys' fees in a divorce proceeding, under Family Code section 3600, even... |
12/28/2000 | B133807 |
Results 1 to 10 of 55