Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Simeon Bozic, Appellant v. Superintendent, Robert Gilmore, State Correctional Institution Greene, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
OPINION NOT REPORTED
MEMORANDUM OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE FRIEDMAN
Simeon Bozic appeals from the July 23, 2015, interlocutory order of the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County (trial court) that transferred his petition for writ of habeas corpus (Petition) to the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas (Philadelphia court). We quash the appeal.
On March 12, 2015, Bozic filed the Petition against Superintendent, Robert Gilmore, the State Correctional Institution at Greene (SCI-Greene), and the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (together, Respondent) in the trial court. In his Petition, Bozic challenged the conditions of his confinement at SCI-Greene, specifically alleging that the Philadelphia court did not impose a sentence authorizing his confinement.1
On July 23, 2015, the trial court issued an order, stating that in accordance with Pa. R. Crim. P. 108(A), a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of a petitioner's confinement shall be filed in the clerk of courts of the judicial district in which the order directing the confinement of the petitioner was entered. The trial court ordered the Petition transferred to the Philadelphia court.
On August 3, 2015, Bozic filed a notice of appeal from an interlocutory appeal as of right pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 311(c), with this court.2 On appeal, Bozic argues that the trial court erred in transferring the Petition to the Philadelphia court because he is confined at SCI-Greene and, in accordance with Bronson v. Domovich, 628 A.2d 1177, 1177 (Pa. Super. 1993) and Pa. R. Crim. P. 108(B), “[a] petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the conditions of the petitioner's confinement in a criminal matter shall be filed with the clerk of courts of the judicial district in which the petitioner is confined.” Thus, because Bozic is confined at SCI-Greene, Bozic maintains that the trial court, not the Philadelphia court, has jurisdiction.
We must first address the appealability of the July 23, 2015, interlocutory order. Bozic claims he may appeal the interlocutory order as of right pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 311(c). We disagree.
Pa. R.A.P. 311(c) provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken as of right from an order in a civil action or proceeding changing venue, transferring the matter to another court of coordinate jurisdiction, or declining to proceed in the matter on the basis of forum non conveniens or analogous principles.” Although Pa. R.A.P. 311(c) permits an appeal as of right from an order “transferring [a] matter to another court of coordinate jurisdiction,” the Note to Pa. R.A.P. 311(c) explains:
[T]he paragraph does not relate to a transfer under ․ 42 Pa. C.S. § 5103 [transfer of erroneously filed matter], ․ because such a transfer is not to a “court of coordinate jurisdiction” within the meaning of this rule; it is intended that there shall be no right of appeal from a transfer order based on improper subject matter jurisdiction.
Pa. R.A.P. 311, Note.
Habeas corpus is properly addressed in the court of record from which the judgment of sentence originated. Brown v. Department of Corrections, 81 A.3d 814, 815 (Pa. 2013). Here, the trial court transferred the Petition to the Philadelphia court, which ordered Bozic's detention. An appeal as of right may not be taken from the trial court's transfer order.
Accordingly, we quash Bozic's appeal.
AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, we hereby quash the appeal filed by Simeon Bozic.
1. This is the only challenge raised.
2. Bozic also filed a motion to reopen the habeas corpus proceeding with the trial court, which the trial court denied on April 5, 2016.
ROCHELLE S. FRIEDMAN, Senior Judge