The People, etc., respondent, v. Richard Castillo, appellant.
Submitted—January 26, 2018
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), both imposed June 20, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Chambers, 142 AD3d 672), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, BARROS, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
Clerk of the Court