The People, etc., respondent, v. Cheryl A. Santiago, appellant.

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Cheryl A. Santiago, appellant.

2012–11309 (Ind.No. 3/08)

Decided: September 25, 2013

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO RUTH C. BALKIN L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ. Malvina Nathanson, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Submitted—April 26, 2013

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed December 12, 2012, upon remittitur from this Court (see People v. Santiago, 97 AD3d 704, lv granted 20 NY3d 935), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and HALL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Copied to clipboard