The People, etc., respondent, v. Khalid Rauf, appellant.

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Khalid Rauf, appellant.

2012–07218 (Ind.No. 3278/11)

Decided: September 25, 2013

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. MARK C. DILLON CHERYL E. CHAMBERS LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ. Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Rona I. Kugler of counsel;  Jonathan Yi on the memorandum), for respondent.

Submitted—July 26, 2013

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), imposed July 19, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248;  cf.  People v. Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257).   The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive.

ENG, P.J., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Copied to clipboard