The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Brian JOGIE, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered March 20, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent determinate terms of imprisonment of 23 years for robbery in the first degree, 15 years for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and 7 years for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the determinate term of imprisonment of 23 years imposed on the conviction of robbery in the first degree to a determinate term of imprisonment of 17 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and his right to procedural due process during a suppression hearing. However, certain of these claims rely on matter dehors the record which are not reviewable on direct appeal (see People v. Finch, 279 A.D.2d 588, 588, 719 N.Y.S.2d 600; People v. DeLeon, 278 A.D.2d 425, 426, 718 N.Y.S.2d 636). To the extent they are reviewable, the record demonstrates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).
“[C]redibility determinations of the hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and its conclusions will not be set aside unless manifestly erroneous or unsupported by the record” (People v. Rivera, 27 A.D.3d 489, 490, 812 N.Y.S.2d 575; see People v. Sutherland, 40 A.D.3d 890, 891, 837 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Bell, 18 A.D.3d 881, 882, 796 N.Y.S.2d 650). Here, the hearing record amply supports the hearing court's determination to credit the police testimony, as well as the court's factual findings that the stop of the defendant's vehicle was based upon reasonable suspicion. In this regard, the radio description of the vehicle involved in a robbery less than five minutes earlier and 2 1/212 blocks away from the scene substantially matched that of the vehicle the defendant was driving (see People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234, 238, 508 N.Y.S.2d 163, 500 N.E.2d 861; People v. McCoy, 30 A.D.3d 441, 442, 817 N.Y.S.2d 337; People v. Devorce, 293 A.D.2d 550, 550, 742 N.Y.S.2d 63; People v. Flanagan, 224 A.D.2d 633, 633, 639 N.Y.S.2d 395; People v. Bloise, 150 A.D.2d 382, 382-383, 540 N.Y.S.2d 538). Accordingly, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence was properly denied.
The County Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the first count of the indictment. The indictment afforded the defendant fair notice of the charges against him and was not jurisdictionally defective (see CPL 200.50 ; People v. Ray, 71 N.Y.2d 849, 850, 527 N.Y.S.2d 740, 522 N.E.2d 1037; People v. Morris, 61 N.Y.2d 290, 293, 473 N.Y.S.2d 769, 461 N.E.2d 1256; People v. Iannone, 45 N.Y.2d 589, 594-595, 412 N.Y.S.2d 110, 384 N.E.2d 656; People v. Dudley, 289 A.D.2d 503, 503-504, 736 N.Y.S.2d 48; People v. Laporte, 184 A.D.2d 803, 804, 584 N.Y.S.2d 662).
The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.