IN RE: Raymond COON

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

IN RE: Raymond COON, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER et al., Respondents.

Decided: June 22, 2006

Before:  CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, SPAIN, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ. Fusco, Brandenstein & Rada, P.C., Woodbury (Milan Rada of counsel), for petitioner. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner was a police officer employed by the Suffolk County Police Department and was directing traffic at a congested intersection.   The undisputed evidence established that while petitioner was guiding a large tractor trailer through the intersection, he stepped backward into a pothole and fell.   Petitioner sustained allegedly disabling injuries to his lower back and coccyx, and applied for accidental disability retirement benefits.   His application was denied on the ground that the incident that caused his injury was not an “accident” within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363.   Following a hearing and redetermination, a Hearing Officer denied his application on the same ground, which determination was accepted by respondent Comptroller.   Petitioner now seeks judicial review.

 We confirm.   An accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law is a “ ‘sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact’ ” (Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 472, 443 N.E.2d 946 [1982], quoting Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North Am., 6 A.D.2d 97, 100, 175 N.Y.S.2d 414 [1958], affd. 7 N.Y.2d 222, 196 N.Y.S.2d 678, 164 N.E.2d 704 [1959];  see Matter of Kazmierczak v. McCall, 252 A.D.2d 728, 729, 675 N.Y.S.2d 398 [1998], lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 813, 680 N.Y.S.2d 906, 703 N.E.2d 764 [1998] ).   An accident will not be found when the event precipitating the injury is a risk of the applicant's ordinary employment duties (see Matter of Pryor v. Hevesi, 14 A.D.3d 776, 776, 788 N.Y.S.2d 239 [2005];  Matter of Lassen v. Hevesi, 9 A.D.3d 780, 781, 779 N.Y.S.2d 868 [2004];  Matter of Mirrer v. Hevesi, 4 A.D.3d 722, 723, 772 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2004];  Matter of Talerico v. McCall, 239 A.D.2d 863, 864, 657 N.Y.S.2d 268 [1997];  Matter of Covel v. New York State Employees' Retirement Sys., 84 A.D.2d 902, 444 N.Y.S.2d 776 [1981], lv. denied 55 N.Y.2d 606, 449 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 434 N.E.2d 720 [1982] ).   Stepping into a pothole while directing traffic is clearly a risk of the work performed by police officers (see Matter of Lucian v. McCall, 7 A.D.3d 905, 906, 776 N.Y.S.2d 637 [2004];  Matter of Amadio v. McCall, 2 A.D.3d 1131, 1132, 768 N.Y.S.2d 699 [2003];  Matter of Minchak v. McCall, 246 A.D.2d 952, 953, 667 N.Y.S.2d 863 [1998] ), even if petitioner was unaware of the hazard that caused his fall (see Matter of Lassen v. Hevesi, supra;  Matter of Minchak v. McCall, supra ).   As the Comptroller's decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record, it will remain undisturbed.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

LAHTINEN, J.

CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, SPAIN and ROSE, JJ., concur.

Copied to clipboard