Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Jonathon CONWAY, etc., et al., appellants, v. Karen L. O'KEEFE, respondent.

Decided: October 31, 2005

HOWARD MILLER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, and MARK C. DILLON, JJ. Kaye & Lenchner, Mineola, N.Y. (Corey B. Kaye of counsel), for appellants. Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated May 6, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff was allegedly injured when, while riding his bicycle, he jumped off a wooden ramp built by the defendant's now deceased husband.

The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based upon the doctrine of assumption of the risk (see Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 662 N.Y.S.2d 421, 685 N.E.2d 202;  Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432, 510 N.Y.S.2d 49, 502 N.E.2d 964;  Boen v. Ski Plattekill, 282 A.D.2d 563, 723 N.Y.S.2d 392).   In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant unreasonably increased the inherent risks of injury associated with the infant plaintiff jumping his bike off the subject ramp or whether the infant was unaware of the potential for such risks (cf. Muniz v. Warwick School Dist., 293 A.D.2d 724, 743 N.Y.S.2d 113;  Boen v. Ski Plattekill, supra ).

In light of our determination, the plaintiffs' remaining contentions have been rendered academic.

Copied to clipboard